alone, as he laconically elucidated the deep structural coherence between Positivism and the alluvial requisites of Isaac Newton, with respect to the putative stasis and invariable measurability of both time and space, i.e. his inherently intuitive postulation of the eternal, fixed, and omni-rational reticulated grid of three-dimensional space, and his specious constant flow of time, also allegedly both linear and infinitely quantifiable.
So all relativity therefore, but in particular (no pun intended) Einstein’s, requires the purchase of dysmorphic mutability and the consequent abandonment of Positivism’s inherent stasis; as in Einstein’s own case, where both space and time are now shockingly, as well as non-intuitively, unmoored from Newton’s static radix; they stretch and contract in concert with each other, as well as in proximity to mass or energy, so belying the descrial of latent PostModernism’s absolute contrapositive simulacrum, or in other words the exigencies of the
15 In accord with Heisenberg, Gödel, Postmodernism’s “Incompleteness”, and the tenor of Collège de ’Pataphysique in Paris: pataphysical documents may have no formal beginnings or endings, second degree logic, meanings often transmitted only in overtones or subtexts - and per Jarry’s Dictum, reader/user input is often required to imagine more precise definitions for superpositional, or otherwise inherently inexplicit, vocabulary and syntax.
